I love graphs. I love visualizations of any kind. If I didn't hate clich
és, I would add that a picture is worth a thousand words. But this is the age of computers, It's not enough to just look at things anymore. I want to be able to play with them. I want interactagraphs.
(Two disclaimers: 1. "Interactagraph" is a word I just made up, and it's awesome. 2. All of my interactagraphs require flash, so if that doesn't work in your browser, you're out of luck.)
Areas and Perimters
A little while ago I got an email from a friend asking me if a rectangle's area is always bigger than its perimeter [footnote 1]. Clearly it's not (consider a 3x5 rectangle with perimeter = 16 and area = 15). The natural follow-up question is, are they ever equal [seriously, see footnote 1 if you haven't already]? Recall if you have a rectangle that's
x wide and
y long, then its area will be
xy and its perimeter will be 2
x+2
y. So finding when area is equal to perimeter means solving the equation
xy=2
x+2
y. Solved for
y this equation looks like:
As I was getting ready to send this answer to him, I realized that it's not very satisfying if you're not familiar/comfortable with algebra. So I whipped up a graph with
graphcalc, and sent that to him:
 |
Graph of xy=2x+2y. |
But I have to say, This isn't a huge improvement over the equation. Unless you are very used to reading graphs, this just looks like a very dangerous stick-figure roller coaster. Then I realized that I wasn't going to print this and mail it to him (I can't afford stamps). This is the Internet; I can make this interactive. I can make an interactagraph:
Nick, This is very cool! These explorations really help visual learners and can move readers to deeper understanding of the concepts. Only confirms my belief in my future chance to say "I knew him when..." So get started!! (before I'm not here to say it.)
ReplyDeleteIt also leaves open the question of how many rectangles with integer side lengths have the property of area = perimeter. I see (3,6) and (6,3) within the window of the graph, but the trivial (0,0) isn't there...
ReplyDelete